finyork.com

Tag: investor tips

  • Twitter is the Ultimate Cryptocurrency Stock to BUY NOW

    Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) shares have soared more than 55% and counting in the past year, 2021 (Sun, The Motley Fool). An iconic platform best known as a micro-blogging social network, Twitter is quickly evolving. Moreover, it’s developing into something that’s likely even more influential and lucrative with the rise of cryptocurrencies. 

    Back in July 2021, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Jack Dorsey announced that Bitcoin would become a “big part” of Twitter, specifically via integration with the company’s products and services. While this may not be well-known to investors, Twitter has already seen a huge rise in its bottom line due to the influx of cryptocurrency developers (Sun, The Motley Fool).

    An Extremely Unique Advantage for Twitter

    Unlike with stocks, there isn’t a centralized Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) database (called EDGAR), where investors can go and get the latest information and financials for cryptocurrencies; until now. Twitter is quickly beginning to play the role of a “decentralized SEC” for the crypto community. Users can follow developer teams on Twitter, thereby getting the newest information on material changes in protocol, new partnerships, and significant events (the equivalent of 8-Ks at the SEC), as well as regular financial reports (10-Qs and 10-Ks). Furthermore, individuals can even report cryptocurrency tweets deemed to be scams or pump-and-dump schemes. A common practice in the vast majority of equity markets, this leads to a prototype of self-regulation (CFA Institute).

    Due to this phenomenon, Twitter is becoming exceedingly popular among altcoin networks such as Ethereum, Avalanche, Solana, Reserve Rights, Chainlink, Monero, and PirateChain, amongst many others. Their setup has attracted likely millions of users specifically desiring to stay up-to-date with the development of their latest tokens. Twitter’s capitalized on this financially by charging developers to promote their accounts via advertisement spending. Developers are incentivized into this because traffic is organic and directly within their target audience. Through this process, Twitter doesn’t even need to spend money on their own advertising. Celebrities, such as Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk, repeatedly use the platform to tout digital currencies such as Dogecoin to his fans, obviously generating substantial viewing activity.

    Financials Back Up Recent Boost in Success and Future Hype for Twitter

    During the second quarter of 2021, Twitter grew its monetizable daily active user base by 10.8% year over year to 206 million (Twitter, Inc – Financial Information). During the same time, revenue grew by a stunning 74% to $1.19 billion (Twitter, Inc – Financial Information). The company’s earnings have recouped their losses from the pandemic recession. Moreover, they more than doubled in the quarter ending June 30th (Twitter, Inc – Financial Information). They’re very clearly currently on track for stellar growth.

    Additionally, Twitter is doing well in terms of liquidity, with cash and investments outweighing its debt plus convertible notes by a factor of two (Twitter, Inc – Financial Information). Most experts agree it is both a great tech and crypto stock to buy at 10 times revenue. Expect continued profits and share gains as part of the boom in cryptocurrencies.

  • How the Green New Deal Would Impact Real Estate Investors

    Depending on your views on climate change, the Green New Deal framework will either conjure up enthusiasm, anxiety, or perhaps a combination of the two. The proposed bill, which has since been explained as a framework towards what we ought to work towards, calls for “maximum energy efficiency”. Based on scientific research, which concludes climate change is imminent and potentially disastrous, the proposal aims for net-zero emissions in the United States by 2050. As part of the plan to get there, this means every building in the country would need to be upgraded for maximal energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort, and durability.

    As of the start of 2020, approximately 40% of the United States’ carbon monoxide emissions come from either commercial or residential real estate buildings (Neiditch, Forbes). Many of the political proponents of the Green New Deal were pushing it behind the idea that up to $1 trillion of infrastructure and coastal real estate could be damaged by global warming by 2050. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), currently, there are approximately 5.6 million commercial real estate buildings in the United States. Specifically in New York City, as part of an ongoing effort to combat climate change, legislation was passed to force buildings that are larger than 25,000 square feet to make energy efficient alterations. The legislation mandates cutting down greenhouse gas emissions 40% by 2030 and 80% by 2050. While the parameters for smaller, residential buildings aren’t as explicit, it’s estimated 95 million homes will be impacted and the cost to owners will be in excess of $400 billion (Neiditch, Forbes).

    While the Green New Deal did not come close to passing as it was originally written and there is unlikely to be sweeping legislation on a national level to overhaul climate change, many cities and states are finding a balance between clean air and economic productivity. Unfortunately, a lot of this conversation tends to be intertwined with politics, but the reality is a rural area in Kentucky (as an example) is not going to have the same availability of economic or human capital resources as a metropolis, like New York or Los Angeles. The lack of availability of these resources puts constraints on the ability of certain regions to advance their technological capabilities, thereby making the real estate investment opportunities unattractive to potential investors.

    Though preparations to meet the 2030 and 2050 targets have begun, there are some more immediate upgrades property owners can make that aren’t as long-term oriented, including switching out lightbulbs for “smart” lighting, upgrading HVAC systems, installing remote-controlled window shades, painting roofs with light-reflecting paint, planting trees, and installing photovoltaics. Additionally, preparation for weatherization is key to having a more energy efficient property. Windows, doors, and insulation can all be switched out and there is legislation to include different types of incentives for property owners to make these changes. Upgrading electric and plumbing systems, as well as installing solar panels can make homes more marketable, considering these changes are becoming more prevalent to the point of necessity. Finally, the Green New Deal framework focuses heavily on “green spaces” – or lawns – that cover more than 40 million acres of land in the United States. Lawns limit biodiversity and encourage pesticide usage and emissions from lawnmowers. The Green New Deal supporters encourage the conversion of these spaces to victory gardens and the expansion of green landscape architecture practices. An example of this is xeriscaping, or sustainable, easy-to-maintain landscaping first used in arid regions, which uses native plants and limits turf areas. This can reduce outdoor water use by as much as 50%, saving water as well as the environment (Neiditch, Forbes).

    So, what does the ambitious Green New Deal framework and the implications it will have on commercial and residential real estate mean for investors? Firstly, investors should focus on high-tech, climate-resilient opportunities in the real estate market. Secondly, residential real estate owners who are not under pressure from legislators to make climate change friendly adjustments to their properties should do so anyway, otherwise they will be far less attractive to prospective investors. Finally, commercial real estate investors, who are under pressure to begin implementing climate change measures mandated by signed legislation, are going to face major hurdles with regards to cost cutting. This legislation poses further challenges to commercial real estate investors, who are already in a difficult position coming out of the pandemic, in addition to facing the necessity to transform their assets to handle the push towards digital transformation. One thing is for sure: the conversation will continue. Being prepared for change is the best way to not only save the environment, but your long-term financial stability as well.

  • How the Green New Deal Would Impact Real Estate Investors

    Depending on your views on climate change, the Green New Deal framework will either conjure up enthusiasm, anxiety, or perhaps a combination of the two. The proposed bill, which has since been explained as a framework towards what we ought to work towards, calls for “maximum energy efficiency”. Based on scientific research, which concludes climate change is imminent and potentially disastrous, the proposal aims for net-zero emissions in the United States by 2050. As part of the plan to get there, this means every building in the country would need to be upgraded for maximal energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort, and durability.

    As of the start of 2020, approximately 40% of the United States’ carbon monoxide emissions come from either commercial or residential real estate buildings (Neiditch, Forbes). Many of the political proponents of the Green New Deal were pushing it behind the idea that up to $1 trillion of infrastructure and coastal real estate could be damaged by global warming by 2050. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), currently, there are approximately 5.6 million commercial real estate buildings in the United States. Specifically in New York City, as part of an ongoing effort to combat climate change, legislation was passed to force buildings that are larger than 25,000 square feet to make energy efficient alterations. The legislation mandates cutting down greenhouse gas emissions 40% by 2030 and 80% by 2050. While the parameters for smaller, residential buildings aren’t as explicit, it’s estimated 95 million homes will be impacted and the cost to owners will be in excess of $400 billion (Neiditch, Forbes).

    While the Green New Deal did not come close to passing as it was originally written and there is unlikely to be sweeping legislation on a national level to overhaul climate change, many cities and states are finding a balance between clean air and economic productivity. Unfortunately, a lot of this conversation tends to be intertwined with politics, but the reality is a rural area in Kentucky (as an example) is not going to have the same availability of economic or human capital resources as a metropolis, like New York or Los Angeles. The lack of availability of these resources puts constraints on the ability of certain regions to advance their technological capabilities, thereby making the real estate investment opportunities unattractive to potential investors.

    Though preparations to meet the 2030 and 2050 targets have begun, there are some more immediate upgrades property owners can make that aren’t as long-term oriented, including switching out lightbulbs for “smart” lighting, upgrading HVAC systems, installing remote-controlled window shades, painting roofs with light-reflecting paint, planting trees, and installing photovoltaics. Additionally, preparation for weatherization is key to having a more energy efficient property. Windows, doors, and insulation can all be switched out and there is legislation to include different types of incentives for property owners to make these changes. Upgrading electric and plumbing systems, as well as installing solar panels can make homes more marketable, considering these changes are becoming more prevalent to the point of necessity. Finally, the Green New Deal framework focuses heavily on “green spaces” – or lawns – that cover more than 40 million acres of land in the United States. Lawns limit biodiversity and encourage pesticide usage and emissions from lawnmowers. The Green New Deal supporters encourage the conversion of these spaces to victory gardens and the expansion of green landscape architecture practices. An example of this is xeriscaping, or sustainable, easy-to-maintain landscaping first used in arid regions, which uses native plants and limits turf areas. This can reduce outdoor water use by as much as 50%, saving water as well as the environment (Neiditch, Forbes).

    So, what does the ambitious Green New Deal framework and the implications it will have on commercial and residential real estate mean for investors? Firstly, investors should focus on high-tech, climate-resilient opportunities in the real estate market. Secondly, residential real estate owners who are not under pressure from legislators to make climate change friendly adjustments to their properties should do so anyway, otherwise they will be far less attractive to prospective investors. Finally, commercial real estate investors, who are under pressure to begin implementing climate change measures mandated by signed legislation, are going to face major hurdles with regards to cost cutting. This legislation poses further challenges to commercial real estate investors, who are already in a difficult position coming out of the pandemic, in addition to facing the necessity to transform their assets to handle the push towards digital transformation. One thing is for sure: the conversation will continue. Being prepared for change is the best way to not only save the environment, but your long-term financial stability as well.

  • CRE Investing Through CrowdStreet

    CrowdStreet™ is an up-and-coming type of crowdfunding website that’s tailored specifically to CRE (Commercial Real Estate) investors. Founded in 2013, the site pairs thousands of investors on their marketplace and pools their money to invest in different CRE properties. The benefits that CrowdStreet claims to provide are: low cost, institutional quality real estate investments that have lower fees than REITs and only include pre-vetted projects.

    As of June 19th, 2021, CrowdStreet has completed 488 deals, raised $1.9B in capital, and returned $197M of investor distributions (www.CrowdStreet.com). With new deals launching every week, the CrowdStreet marketplace is also unique because it gives prospective investors the following three (3) projections on each CRE investment: (1) Targeted Investor IRR, (2) Targeted Equity Multiple, and (3) Targeted Investment Period. Keeping in mind these are all pre-vetted projects, this allows prospective investors to pick from multiple properties based on the attributes that are geared towards their goals.

    Since there are many different types of real estate crowdfunding websites, CrowdStreet in particular distinguishes itself because they target CRE properties specifically. They then break-down individual prospective gains, equity multiples, and the period the investor will have their capital tied up. This allows investors to see a clearer overview of their investment return potential and the amount of time their capital will be utilized for the CRE investment, so they can make more informed decisions, as well as better manage the risk of their overall portfolio. But there’s a catch. While CrowdStreet is continuing to grow along with their user base, an investor account minimum must be $25,000 and the platform is only available to accredited investors. For seasoned CRE investors, that may not be as big of a problem. However, for the average qualifying CRE investor, CrowdStreet’s business model is viewed as highly illiquid.

    Overall, while CrowdStreet offers distinct advantages to CRE investors, its limitations prevent it from reaching a wider audience. Clearly that’s their intention, but perhaps some of the requirements limit the potential success of their offerings. For example, if a non-accredited investor has a higher risk tolerance and is willing to invest the minimum amount, the CRE project may not get financing because that investor wouldn’t be accepted on CrowdStreet. Similarly, if an accredited investor is more risk averse, or is not in a position to immediately invest $25,000 in a given project over a period of years, there is no middle-ground and again, the CRE project may not receive financing. Concisely, within the limited scope of their business model, there is more CrowdStreet can do to broaden their user base and thereby pave the way for more CRE projects to receive financing.

  • What is a REIG? The Pros and Cons

    A REIG (Real Estate Investment Group) is a group of private investors who invest almost exclusively in real estate by pooling money, knowledge, and/or time to acquire properties that generate income (Brummer, Millionacres). Investment strategies for REIGs will differ based on each group’s specific strengths. A REIG is not a real estate investment trust (REIT) or crowdfunding real estate venture, although superficially, they may appear similar. They both invest the majority of pooled funds in real estate or real estate debt, earn income primarily from real estate, and distribute most of the income back to the parties involved.

    Pros of a REIG

    A REIG is a way for you to have your investment funds backed by physical real estate while allowing you to leverage the collective buying power and experience of the group. Additionally, investing in real estate as a group can give you a less “hands on” approach to real estate investing, or more, depending on your desires and the strengths of your group. Furthermore, a REIG is a form of “diversification” in the sense that your thoughts about the financial incentives of an acquisition may be different than your partners in the group. Of course, this can be a negative if you are unable to persuade others investors in the group and the property turns out to be a successful investment. However if you surround yourself with like-minded investors, which is generally the case for most REIGs, this is unlikely to occur often. Going back to buying power, groups of investors can pool a very substantial amount of money together. This would in turn allow them to invest greater sums of cash and diversify their investments over a greater number of real estate properties. Conversely, an individual investor may only have enough capital to put into one – or a few – properties that may wind up taking an unexpected downturn. Finally, there’s a benefit to having fellow investors with the same stakes you do because you have the opportunity to learn from them. You would be able to potentially use some of those successful strategies in your own personal real estate investments.

    Cons of a REIG

    Many cons to a REIG can also be viewed as strengths, depending on the amount of weight you pull in it. For example, a more “hands-off” approach to investing through a REIG can turn detrimental if the individual(s) responsible for the “hands-on” tasks do a poor job. Additionally, since REIGs pool your investment money with others, you lose out on some profit prospective with it being shared throughout the group. To the contrast, this could be viewed as a way to mitigate your conceivable losses – as mentioned in the strengths – but skilled real estate investors rarely have a pessimistic view of investments they are willing to enter into. While some view this as insignificant, the tax structure and fees associated with REIGs similarly lower your bottom line profit. Along the same lines, due to regulations and commonplace agreements signed between the parties, pulling your money out of the REIG can be burdensome and costly. Finally, many investors are prone to different management styles, have different investment goals, and differ in many other germane ways. Conflicts arising from disagreements between members in a REIG can lead to not only unfavorable financial outcomes, but it can go as far as breaking up the REIG.

    Concisely, REIGs are a good fit for novice or expect real estate investors, as well as everything in between. From our perspective, the concept seems like it would be a better fit for those looking to enter the real estate market, rapidly expand their presence in that market, or if you have unique knowledge, but do not have the cash saved to personally invest in real estate yet. Reviewing the pros and cons alone, unfortunately, does not provide enough guidance as to whether or not this is the right investment vehicle for you. As with most financial investments, REIGs can be beneficial or detrimental for you, completely dependent on your financial situation, knowledge of the real estate market, and more. We do believe that an invaluable positive to REIGs is the knowledge potential from other investors in your group. Some of the most successful investors from different parts of the globe have said that intellectual capital can prove to be exponentially more valuable than simply having excess cash in a savings account, with no unique or constructive ideas on how to put that capital to use in order to maximize a positive return. 

  • Passive Real Estate Investing

    When reading about real estate investing, often times investors think of active real estate investors, who are essentially landlords. There are also both direct and indirect passive real estate investors. Passive real estate investing is investing in real estate without substantial hands-on effort or active participation from the investor. They invest through syndications, online crowdfunding, individual real estate funds, and real estate investment trusts. In fact, many would argue passive real estate investing requires the least experience and hassle while offering more diversification and liquidity.

    Direct Passive Real Estate Investing

    With direct real estate investing, an investor will purchase a property or portion of a property that is subsequently rented out. Often, real estate investors that purchase entire properties will hire what is known as a property manager, or property management company, to take care of the day to day maintenance and tasks such as collecting rent. Post-purchase of the property, hiring a property management company allows an investor to essentially be hands-off in the management of the property. Hence the term passive real estate investing in this context.

    Indirect Passive Real Estate Investing

    To the contrary, indirect real estate investing is a process where individuals invest in a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust) or a real estate related mutual fund. This type of real estate investing is considered passive because there is no day-to-day management needed and it’s also considered indirect because it doesn’t involve a specific piece of real estate. Investors then collect passive income as returns or dividends from funds.

    Regardless of which method you prefer, there is a great potential for positive cash flow and overall wealth generation in real estate investment markets. In upcoming posts, we’ll dive into more specifics about REITs, as well as other types of real estate funds investors are often more drawn to.